The NYC mayoral election results have taken center stage as New York City concludes one of its most anticipated political races in years. Early results from across the five boroughs show a tight contest between Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo, and Curtis Sliwa. The campaign season was marked by sharp contrasts in leadership style, party alignment, and the direction each candidate envisioned for the city’s future.
Overview of the 2025 NYC Mayoral Race
The 2025 New York City mayoral election has drawn historic interest, largely because of the diverse backgrounds and political positions of the major candidates. Zohran Mamdani, representing the Democratic Party, entered the general election as the frontrunner after securing his party’s nomination. Andrew Cuomo, the former New York governor, reentered politics as an Independent, promising practical governance and fiscal responsibility. Curtis Sliwa, a familiar Republican figure and founder of the Guardian Angels, ran on a platform emphasizing law and order.
This election has witnessed a surge in civic engagement, with voters expressing frustration over housing costs, public safety, and transportation inefficiencies. Many residents viewed this election as a turning point, determining whether New York would lean further into progressive reforms or return to centrist and conservative leadership.
Early Voting and Voter Turnout
Voter participation in the 2025 election has surpassed recent records, signaling widespread public engagement. Over 734,000 early ballots were cast, nearly quadrupling the turnout from the 2021 mayoral race. Early voting locations across Brooklyn, Queens, and Manhattan reported long lines, particularly during the final weekend before Election Day.
Younger voters, especially those aged 18 to 35, made up a larger share of the electorate than in previous cycles, reflecting growing enthusiasm among progressives and first-time voters. Meanwhile, older voters showed consistent turnout, many drawn to Cuomo’s message of moderation and stability. The mix of generational and ideological participation has added depth and unpredictability to the election outcome.
Democratic Primary and Its Impact
The Democratic primary earlier this year reshaped the city’s political landscape and established Zohran Mamdani as the leading voice for progressive Democrats. His victory came through New York City’s ranked-choice voting system, where he led by more than 12 percentage points after second-choice preferences were tallied. Mamdani’s campaign focused on addressing housing affordability, public transit reform, and workers’ rights, themes that resonated with younger, diverse, and working-class communities across Brooklyn and Queens.
Following his loss in the primary, Andrew Cuomo declared his independent candidacy, arguing that New York needed pragmatic leadership rather than ideological promises. His entry split the centrist vote, leaving both Mamdani and Cuomo competing for overlapping constituencies. This dynamic set the stage for one of the most competitive general elections in modern New York history.
Key Issues Shaping the Election Results
Affordable Housing and Cost of Living
Housing remains the defining issue in the 2025 mayoral race. Zohran Mamdani proposed rent control expansion, increased investment in public housing, and restrictions on speculative real estate development. Andrew Cuomo’s plan focused on mixed-income projects and easing zoning restrictions to spur private construction, while Curtis Sliwa emphasized tax incentives for developers to build affordable units. As rents continue to rise citywide, the candidate with the most credible plan for long-term housing stability appears to be gaining momentum among middle-income voters.
Public Safety and Crime
Public safety continues to shape the city’s political debate. Curtis Sliwa campaigned on restoring strong police presence and expanding community patrol initiatives. Cuomo took a balanced approach, calling for both reform and adequate police funding, while Mamdani pushed for community-based programs and restorative justice models. The Bronx and Staten Island leaned more toward law-and-order candidates, while Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn favored reform-minded approaches, reflecting a clear geographic divide in voter priorities.
Economic Growth and Small Business Recovery
Economic recovery after the pandemic was another central theme of the election. Mamdani’s platform prioritized small business grants, wage protections, and the creation of green jobs. Cuomo highlighted deregulation and partnerships with major corporations to attract investment, while Sliwa proposed lowering business taxes and reducing bureaucratic barriers. Each vision appealed to distinct segments of the electorate—Mamdani’s ideas drew working-class support, Cuomo’s appealed to entrepreneurs, and Sliwa’s connected with business owners seeking fewer restrictions.
Public Transit and Infrastructure
Transit reform played a major role in the candidates’ policy agendas. Mamdani’s idea of fare-free public transit gained significant traction among younger and lower-income voters, who see transportation costs as a barrier to employment and education. Cuomo advocated for improving MTA efficiency through management reforms, while Sliwa focused on increasing safety in subways and reducing vandalism. Commuters across the five boroughs expressed hope that the next administration will finally address the city’s aging infrastructure and unreliable transit service.
Candidate Breakdown and Current Standing
Zohran Mamdani entered Election Day with a solid base in progressive areas such as Brooklyn and Queens, where his campaign infrastructure and door-to-door efforts were strongest. His message of equality and affordability resonated with renters, students, and working families. Andrew Cuomo, despite his independent status, retained strong name recognition and appealed to moderates and older voters who valued his experience. Curtis Sliwa, running under the Republican banner, solidified his support among conservative neighborhoods in Staten Island and certain areas of the Bronx.
Polls leading up to Election Day showed Mamdani holding a slim lead over Cuomo, with Sliwa trailing by a considerable margin. However, analysts cautioned that absentee ballots and late turnout could narrow the gap, leaving room for post-election shifts once all votes are counted.
Borough-Level Voting Patterns
Manhattan
In Manhattan, the electorate favored Zohran Mamdani in progressive strongholds like the Lower East Side and Upper West Side. Andrew Cuomo performed better in Midtown and the Upper East Side, areas with higher concentrations of professionals and retirees. Curtis Sliwa’s presence was minimal here but noticeable among certain conservative enclaves.
Brooklyn
Brooklyn has proven to be Mamdani’s strongest base, particularly in neighborhoods like Crown Heights, Bushwick, and Bedford-Stuyvesant. His community-driven campaign drew significant turnout from younger residents and tenants’ unions. Cuomo maintained moderate support in southern parts of the borough, including Bay Ridge and Dyker Heights, where voters prioritized stability and public safety.
Queens
Queens, Mamdani’s home borough, delivered strong numbers for him early in the vote count. Areas like Astoria and Jackson Heights turned out heavily for the Democratic nominee. However, Cuomo made inroads in middle-class neighborhoods such as Whitestone and Bayside, where concerns over crime and taxes outweighed progressive appeals.
The Bronx
The Bronx showed mixed results, with Mamdani leading in districts where youth turnout surged and Sliwa performing well in communities favoring tougher policing measures. Cuomo’s message of balanced governance resonated with union households and small business owners in parts of the borough.
Staten Island
Staten Island, historically conservative, overwhelmingly supported Curtis Sliwa. His focus on public safety and policing reforms resonated with local voters, though the borough’s turnout was not large enough to shift the overall citywide results.
Public Sentiment and Polling Trends
Public sentiment throughout the campaign leaned toward change, with voters demanding new leadership styles and stronger accountability. Polls conducted in the final week indicated that most New Yorkers were dissatisfied with the current cost of living, housing shortages, and transit performance. Mamdani’s progressive platform captured this discontent, while Cuomo’s moderate appeal attracted voters seeking continuity without radical change. Sliwa’s steady message on crime found loyal but limited traction in specific communities.
Potential Implications of the Election Results
The 2025 mayoral results carry significant implications for the city’s future. A Mamdani victory would likely lead to aggressive housing reforms, progressive taxation, and expanded social programs. A Cuomo win would return New York to centrist policies emphasizing fiscal responsibility and development. If Sliwa were to succeed, the city would experience a shift toward conservative priorities, focusing on law enforcement and deregulation. Each outcome would reshape how New York balances progress, safety, and economic growth in the coming years.
What Happens Next
Once the final votes are certified, attention will turn to the transition process. The next mayor will face urgent challenges, including rising rent, subway funding deficits, and police reform. Observers expect the winning candidate to outline a 100-day plan within weeks of taking office. The outcome of this election will set the tone for how New York confronts its post-pandemic recovery and long-term sustainability.
Conclusion
The NYC mayoral election results capture the complexity of modern New York—diverse, divided, and deeply engaged in shaping its future. With record-breaking turnout and passionate debate, this election has proven that New Yorkers remain invested in their city’s direction. Whether the city continues its progressive transformation or pivots toward centrism, the result will echo through every borough for years to come.
How do you feel about the outcome of this historic race? Share your thoughts and let’s keep the conversation alive in the comments.