The ongoing debate over farm eminent domain has reached a boiling point in Cranbury Township, New Jersey, as local officials move to seize a 175-year-old family farm for a large affordable housing project. The Henry family, owners of the land since 1850, are making one last plea to the community and township committee to save their cherished farmland from government acquisition. This real-time story highlights the tension between public needs and private property rights, with the fate of the farm hanging in the balance as planning boards prepare to vote.
The Cranbury Farm Eminent Domain Case: What’s at Stake
Chris and Andy Henry, co-owners of the 21-acre farm on South River Road, have devoted years—and over $200,000—to maintaining the property, which has been in their family for generations. The farm features open spaces, a historic farmhouse rebuilt after a fire in 1878, and is currently operated by a tenant who raises sheep and cattle. Despite repeated offers from warehouse developers over the past three decades, the Henrys have steadfastly refused to sell, prioritizing preservation over profit.
Now, Cranbury Township is invoking eminent domain to acquire the land for state-mandated affordable housing. The township must permit the construction of 265 affordable housing units by 2035, and officials argue that suitable land is scarce, especially west of Route 30. The Henrys and their supporters, however, question the wisdom of placing affordable housing in an area increasingly surrounded by warehouses, arguing it would isolate future residents and undermine the town’s commitment to farmland preservation.
Community members have rallied behind the Henry family, packing town hall meetings and launching online fundraisers to support legal expenses. As of early June 2025, supporters have raised tens of thousands toward a $50,000 goal, signaling widespread local opposition to the use of farm eminent domain in this case.
Why Farm Eminent Domain Is Sparking National Debate
Eminent domain allows governments to acquire private property for public use, provided the owner is compensated at market value. While the law is intended to serve the greater good, its application to family farms often sparks fierce resistance. In Cranbury, the issue has divided the community, with some residents urging the township to explore alternative sites and others questioning the fairness of state mandates that pit affordable housing against agricultural heritage.
The Henrys’ attorney points out that Cranbury has historically prioritized farmland preservation, having protected over 2,000 acres in recent years. Yet, the current push for affordable housing threatens to erode that legacy. The family’s fight is not just about one farm—it’s a stand against a system that values land as a commodity rather than a cultural and historical asset.
Across the country, similar cases are making headlines. In Colorado and other states, family farms are increasingly targeted for public projects, leading to legal battles and community protests. The Cranbury case stands out because of the farm’s long history and the strong local support for the Henry family.
The Human Side of Farm Eminent Domain
Behind the legal jargon and policy debates are real people whose lives are deeply intertwined with the land. For the Henrys, the farm is more than property—it’s a living connection to their ancestors, a symbol of resilience, and a source of community pride. Their story resonates with farmers nationwide who face the threat of losing land that has been in their families for generations.
The emotional toll is evident in the words of Chris Henry: “We just want to keep the farm. It embodies everything this community values.” The family’s plea to the township committee underscores the personal cost of farm eminent domain, urging officials to consider alternatives that respect both public needs and private legacies.
Local officials acknowledge the difficulty of their position. Mayor Lisa Knierim has emphasized that the decision to pursue eminent domain was not made lightly, but is seen as necessary to comply with state law and avoid costly legal battles with developers. Still, the controversy has led to heated meetings and even threats against council members, highlighting the intensity of public feeling.
Looking Ahead: The Future of Farm Eminent Domain in America
As the Cranbury case moves toward a final decision, it raises broader questions about the future of farmland in America. Will state mandates for affordable housing and infrastructure continue to override the rights of family farmers? Or will communities find ways to balance growth with preservation?
The answer may lie in creative solutions—such as incentivizing the development of less historically significant land, or partnering with farmers to integrate housing without displacing agriculture. For now, the Henry family and their supporters are holding out hope that their farm will remain in their hands, setting an example for other communities facing similar challenges.
If you care about the future of family farms and the impact of farm eminent domain, now is the time to get involved. Support local preservation efforts, attend town meetings, and make your voice heard.