The White House has confirmed a sweeping leadership shift in one of its most ambitious building initiatives, announcing that shalom baranes will guide the design and construction of a new presidential ballroom. The decision introduces a major architectural presence into a project already drawing national attention for its scale, cost, and its impact on the historic Executive Mansion.
A High-Profile Appointment for a High-Stakes Build
President Trump’s team has decided to place the ballroom project under the direction of Shalom Baranes, a prominent Washington, D.C. architect known for large federal developments and secure government facilities. This appointment follows internal concerns over the original design team’s capacity to manage a structure of this size. According to White House officials, Baranes’ firm now carries responsibility for the planning, execution, and architectural coherence of the new structure.
The incoming architect inherits a project that has grown well beyond its initial concept. Early sketches anticipated a more modest space for ceremonial gatherings. Updated directives, however, reflect a far more extensive build, including additional event capabilities, broader infrastructure, and new security integrations tailored to high-capacity functions.
A Ballroom Unlike Any Previous White House Addition
The current vision includes a ballroom of approximately 90,000 square feet, making it one of the largest structural additions contemplated for the Executive Mansion in more than a generation. The updated design aims to host up to 1,000 guests, reflecting a desire for larger official events, high-level diplomatic receptions, and major political gatherings.
Cost estimates have risen to around $300 million, an increase from earlier projections as the scale and features evolved. The upgraded plans integrate modern support systems, specialized acoustic design, high-capacity HVAC units, reinforced security technology, and redesigned access points to handle extensive foot traffic during high-profile events.
This ballroom will replace the previous East Wing structure, requiring full demolition of the existing wing before foundation work can continue. Construction teams have already prepared equipment and staging areas for this phase, marking the beginning of one of the most substantial White House construction campaigns in decades.
Why the White House Turned to a New Architect
Sources familiar with the process point to two key motivations behind selecting Baranes.
First, the original design group lacked the personnel and operational range needed for a project that expanded both in size and technical complexity. As the ballroom grew from a moderate gathering space into a monumental venue capable of accommodating state-level events, the White House concluded that a larger and more seasoned firm was required.
Second, Shalom Baranes’ profiles include major government projects that demand advanced engineering coordination, strict security compliance, and precise collaboration with federal review bodies. This experience aligned with the updated demands of the ballroom’s design, especially given its sensitive location within one of the most secure and symbolically important buildings in the world.
A senior official stated that the transition reflects a “practical need to match the project’s scale with the appropriate expertise,” emphasizing Baranes’ longstanding influence over the architectural fabric of the nation’s capital.
A Redesign With Significant Historic Impact
The demolition of the previous East Wing has triggered intense reactions from preservation groups and legislative figures. The East Wing, though modified over time, has long been considered a stable element of the White House grounds. Its removal marks one of the most significant physical changes to the mansion in decades.
Architectural preservation advocates argue that major alterations should undergo broader review. They point to longstanding concerns about preserving the historic character of the Executive Mansion. Critics assert that the ballroom’s size and footprint may overshadow traditional spaces and set a precedent for unusually large presidential construction projects.
Lawmakers have introduced a proposal informally referred to as the “No Palaces Act,” seeking to require independent oversight and congressional authorization before any future administration undertakes large privately funded building projects at the White House. Supporters contend the measure would prevent unchecked alterations to national heritage sites.
How Baranes Plans to Navigate Federal Review
A key step in the next phase involves submitting detailed architectural plans to the National Capital Planning Commission. The commission holds authority over major federal design projects and provides an essential layer of review for additions to historically significant buildings.
White House officials have signaled that these plans will be submitted shortly, after which the commission will begin its formal evaluation. This review ensures that landscaping, building height, exterior design elements, and grounds integration remain consistent within federal planning guidelines.
Baranes’ prior dealings with the commission provide him with a nuanced understanding of its requirements. His firm’s past work on government buildings is expected to help streamline the submission process, even as the scale of the project guarantees a thorough and lengthy evaluation.
Construction Already in Motion
Despite the upcoming review, the White House has already initiated multiple preparatory steps:
- Demolition staging began earlier this month, with crews positioning equipment near the East Wing perimeter.
- Ground reinforcement is underway, an important step before heavy machinery begins excavation.
- Material transport routes have been established to avoid disruption to daily White House operations.
- Security coordination has intensified to manage construction staff access and equipment screenings.
These early activities fall within the allowable pre-review stage, enabling crews to proceed without interfering with the commission’s authority over final design approval.
A Project Set to Influence Washington’s Architectural Landscape
The new ballroom is not only a White House addition; it also stands to shape the architectural landscape of Washington, D.C. Large federal projects often influence city design conversations for years, and this ballroom’s size and purpose ensure it will remain a focal point even after construction ends.
Architectural observers note that additions of this magnitude often affect surrounding infrastructure, including traffic planning, visitor access routes, and security perimeters. Though the ballroom will remain closed to the public, its existence will carry long-term logistical implications for the daily operations of the Executive Mansion.
Furthermore, the selection of Shalom Baranes highlights a broader trend: major federal building initiatives increasingly favor firms with specialized expertise in secure facility design. This preference reflects evolving political and security landscapes, as well as a growing emphasis on large-capacity, multi-function federal facilities.
A Closer Look at Baranes’ Approach to Federal Architecture
Baranes’ career emphasizes blending modern capability with respect for Washington’s established design language. His firm is known for integrating contemporary function into traditionally inspired architecture, a balance particularly relevant to projects on federal grounds.
Experts expect Baranes to adopt an approach that maintains visual harmony with existing White House elements while introducing updated systems necessary for modern event hosting. The ballroom’s internal layout will likely prioritize:
- High-efficiency operations, designed to support large gatherings without straining existing systems.
- Security-focused infrastructure, including advanced surveillance integration.
- Flexible interior design, enabling variations in seating, staging, and ceremonial layouts.
- Durable material selection, ensuring longevity given the building’s expected usage patterns.
These priorities reflect current trends in federal design and the unique requirements of a venue meant for both political and diplomatic functions.
Public Reaction and Ongoing Debate
Public response to the project remains sharply divided. Supporters welcome the idea of a grand event space capable of hosting major national ceremonies. They argue that past administrations used external venues due to the absence of adequate on-site facilities, and that a purpose-built ballroom strengthens the White House’s ability to host large gatherings without logistical challenges.
Opponents counter that the ballroom risks altering the historical identity of the mansion, both structurally and symbolically. They express concern about the growing exclusivity of large presidential spaces and question whether such a major build is necessary for standard White House functions.
The debate has intensified as construction continues, with many Americans watching closely to see how the final design integrates with the existing structure.
The Road Ahead: What to Expect in the Coming Months
While the project remains in its formative phase under Baranes’ leadership, several milestones are expected soon:
- The release of the full design documents detailing the ballroom’s architecture.
- Formal review by the National Capital Planning Commission, which may lead to design modifications.
- Completion of East Wing demolition, clearing space for foundation work.
- Groundbreaking on the ballroom itself, pending final approvals.
These steps will determine the overall timeline and help clarify how closely the final product aligns with the administration’s vision.
The appointment of Shalom Baranes, noted once more here, introduces a level of expertise meant to anchor the ambitious project through its most complex stages. His leadership will shape how the ballroom ultimately fits into the broader history of the White House.
What are your thoughts on the scope and impact of this major White House construction? Share your perspective and join the conversation below.