Does Kamala Harris get Secret Service protection? As of August 29, 2025, the answer is no. Former Vice President Harris will no longer receive it after September 1 following a decision from President Trump to revoke the extended coverage that had been granted earlier this year.
When Harris left office on January 20, 2025, she was entitled under federal law to six months of Secret Service protection. That coverage expired on July 21, 2025. President Biden, citing ongoing security concerns, had issued a directive to extend her protection until January 2026. However, in a letter signed on August 28, President Trump officially rescinded that extension. The order states that her detail will conclude at the end of August, meaning Harris will be without a Secret Service team as of September 1.
Latest Developments at a Glance
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| January 20, 2025 | Harris leaves office; six-month protection begins by law. |
| July 21, 2025 | Standard protection period expires. |
| Early 2025 | Biden grants extension through January 2026. |
| August 28, 2025 | Trump signs memorandum revoking that extension. |
| September 1, 2025 | Harris’s Secret Service detail officially ends. |
Key Points Summary
- Former Vice President Harris’s six-month statutory protection ended on July 21.
- President Biden had extended her coverage through January 2026.
- President Trump revoked the extension on August 28.
- Harris’s protection officially ends on September 1.
- She is preparing for a national book tour without a federal security detail.
Why Was the Decision Made?
The Trump administration has framed the move as aligning with the standard legal requirement for former vice presidents. Under U.S. law, only presidents are guaranteed lifetime Secret Service coverage. Vice presidents receive protection for six months after leaving office unless an active president authorizes more.
Critics, however, argue that this revocation comes at a politically sensitive time. Harris is about to embark on a 15-city tour to promote her new memoir 107 Days. The book, which reflects on her final months in office and her career in national politics, is expected to draw significant crowds. High-profile public events like these often raise questions about security needs.
Political and Public Reactions
The decision has sparked strong reactions from both supporters and opponents. Allies of Harris have voiced concern that ending her protection just as she begins a nationwide speaking tour could leave her vulnerable. They highlight her ongoing public profile and the polarized political climate as reasons she should retain coverage.
On the other hand, Trump supporters argue that extending protection indefinitely sets an unnecessary precedent and creates additional taxpayer costs. They note that other former vice presidents, including Mike Pence and Dick Cheney, lived without extended security details after their terms ended.
Read Also-Kamala Harris Secret Service Protection Revoked Ahead of Book Tour
What Happens Next?
Without federal protection, Harris will likely rely on privately contracted security teams. High-profile political figures who remain in the public eye often make similar arrangements once Secret Service coverage ends. While private security can be tailored to her needs, the shift marks a clear change in the level of federal resources dedicated to her safety.
This transition will be closely watched during her book tour. Venues, event organizers, and local law enforcement will likely coordinate with her staff to ensure public appearances proceed safely. The scale of security may vary by city, but without the Secret Service, the responsibility now shifts to Harris and her team.
In Summary
As of September 1, Kamala Harris will not get Secret Service protection. Her standard six-month detail concluded in July, and although President Biden extended her coverage, President Trump revoked that order on August 28. The timing, coming just weeks before her nationwide book tour, has sparked debate over whether political figures of her stature should receive longer-term protection.
Whether through private security or increased local coordination, Harris will continue her public schedule without the federal shield she once had. For many observers, this marks not just a change in policy but a shift in how America views the post-office safety of its most visible leaders.
The story raises important questions about security, politics, and precedent. What do you think—should former vice presidents like Harris keep their protection longer, or should the law remain as it is today? Share your thoughts in the comments.